DARK SHADOWS FORUMS

General Discussions => Current Talk Archive => Current Talk '25 I => Polls Archive => Topic started by: Zahir on October 29, 2006, 11:07:15 PM

Title: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Zahir on October 29, 2006, 11:07:15 PM
Okay, here are the Dark Shadows we've actually had:  The original series, the 1991 remake, the 2004 pilot, two movies, the Marion Ross novels, the Lara Parker novels, the CD series, the Innovation comics, the Gold Key comics, the Off Off Broadway play of the same name back in the 1980s and of course various/sundry explorations in fan fiction.

Suppose a new Dark Shadows were to be created.  Maybe on the SciFi Channe or HBO, or perhaps some regular network, or it could be made for syndication.  Further suppose that it is being reborn as a weekly, hour-long series for the upcoming 2007-08 season.

Hey, we can dream, right?

As an exercise in imagination, how would you prefer to see DS reborn?  And please, please, please feel free to explain your answer.   [hall2_grin]
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Phil on October 29, 2006, 11:58:44 PM
Live on tape. George Clooney did this with Fail Safe. I'll bet actors would go berserk over it.
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: arashi on October 30, 2006, 03:48:35 AM
I love the characters and stories too much to let them go completely. A new imagining I would definitely love to see, encorporating new AND old storylines with tight plots and dialogue. I'm not sure a Next Generation idea would work because there are too many things from the original series that would still be affecting the "future".
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: retzev on October 30, 2006, 04:50:12 AM
I was originally thinking of something Next Generation style, but I voted for a prequel about an unexplored period of Collins history, that's a great idea I hadn't heard of before. Maybe something like that could focus on characters being transported into future periods like the 1960s as much as the classic focused on transporting characters back in time?
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Brandon Collins on October 30, 2006, 05:13:30 AM
I voted for a TNG approach. I love the old stories as well, but we've got our DVDs to satisfy us for that aspect. It's time to move on. We're forty years down the road, and I think DS would have a certain aspect of allure with the characters having aged accordingly. Not to mention that 40 years has passed. 40 years which could be very useful in setting up new mysteries that started in the past a la Liz's thing with Jason and Paul at the beginning of the original DS.

 [female_skull]
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: retzev on October 30, 2006, 05:40:35 AM
I'm having second thoughts here [hall2_sad] You make some good points there, Brandon. I really like the idea of the TNG approach - I'm torn between the TNG and the Prequel. But then again, considering the possibilities in time travel, the only difference between the two is in which time period the series begins, right?  A new DS could cover everything from a prequel to a sequel and everything in between -
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: MagnusTrask on October 30, 2006, 06:39:16 PM
I love the characters and stories too much to let them go completely. A new imagining I would definitely love to see, encorporating new AND old storylines with tight plots and dialogue. I'm not sure a Next Generation idea would work because there are too many things from the original series that would still be affecting the "future".

Competent storytelling would get around this.   "Lost" deals with the past but they tell the backstory economically so that it doesn't take over or overwhelm the present.

I never got retellings.   Why do it again?
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: MagnusTrask on October 30, 2006, 06:46:57 PM
Live on tape. George Clooney did this with Fail Safe. I'll bet actors would go berserk over it.

And they shouldn't tell them it's live until right before they go on.
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Nelson Collins on October 30, 2006, 07:12:14 PM
I'd favor the TNG approach, even though Big Finish seems to be doing that.  I would like to see David as the master of Collinwood, behaving as Roger did (the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, you know!).  David's kids and Carolyn's (did she remarry?) kids could be the "focus" the way Vicki, Carolyn, Maggie, et all. were for the original series.  However, the show would need a new hook.  Sadly, since Angelique, Barnabas and Quentin were all immortal, it would be difficult to have the original actors return.  Could they be recast?  Or perhaps find ways of introducing new Witches and vampires and werewolves to the fold.

Perhaps Sam Hall's article in TV Guide after the show went off the air could be a template for what happened and the show could start relatively fresh.

Say, Collinsport as a casino resort.  the Cannery and fleet are facing EPA troubles due to pollution and overfishing.  Environmental protesters picket the cannery and one of them with a secret, a young woman who learns that he is actually David's daughter from a hushed up indiscretion years before.  A series of disasters puts the Collines on the brink of financial ruin, bizarre things, like the sudden inexplicible rotting of the fleet's catch one day, the tide turning red with blood for no reason.  The illigitimate daughter is possessed by the spirit of Angelique returning for revenge.

Just a few things off the top of my head...
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Para L. Time on October 30, 2006, 09:14:47 PM
In my story, Future Shadows, Amy Jennings Collins is the mistress of Collinwood. She hasn't left Collinwood in ten years, since the disappearance of her husband, David Collins. Amy and David's son, Christopher Collins, has inherited the werewolf curse. And Willie's son, Dr. Julius Loomis, has inherited the Old House, where he performs experiments in the basement laboratory.
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Zahir on October 30, 2006, 09:30:10 PM
I see I'm the only one to have voted for a spinoff.

The problems with TNG approach have already been touched upon--although, as of the series end, only Quentin was still immortal.  It would be tricky, albeit not impossible, to design such a show without having to deal in detail with the storylines of the original.  Perhaps references to a rash of witch-hunting in the late 1700s, or things David and Carolyn simply refuse to discuss from their youth (such as David's mother!).  Workable, yes.  But, and this is JMHO, rather tricky to pull off.

(Hmmm...now I'm imagining David having married Amy, and that somehow he's arranged to prevent the werewolf curse from being passed down--adoption perhaps?  Or a pact with gypsies?  In return for what?)

Okay, this is soooo weird.  Because while I was typing the above, Para L. Time posted their idea.  A total coincidence, really!

Myself, I've always loved the little details about the background that we never really got much information about.  We know, for example, that Isaac Collins originally landed at Mermaid's Bay, south of today's Collinsport.  I've often wondered what that town is like.  Are there any Collinses there?  Could Judah Zachary have had a disciple or two in that town?  Are they still there, in one way or another?  Perhaps that is where Mrs. Johnson came from?  Or Paul Stoddard?  Wouldn't it be interesting if one of the prominent families in that town is named Winters?  Or Bradford?

I've already kinda/sorta created my own idea of how to re-imagine the show, here:  http://www.geocities.com/zahir13/dark/dsi.html

Honestly, I've always wondered about the Collins family when Jamison was a relatively young man, in the 1920s.  Something about silent movies and the flappers, about Prohibition and the world still reeling from the first World War, coupled with excitement over discoveries in Egypt--much could be made of this.

Or what of the years between 1840 and 1897?  We have two names from that era--Benjamin and Theodore Collins.  But we know next-to-nothing about either one.  Ah, the possibilities!
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: BuzzH on October 30, 2006, 10:07:07 PM
I see I'm the only one to have voted for a spinoff.

The only problem w/a spin-off is it's just that, a 'spin-off', and therefore not the same show.  I mean, Happy Days was Happy Days, and Laverne & Shirley was Laverne & Shirley.   [hall2_cool]
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: arashi on October 30, 2006, 11:47:10 PM
But the problem is, with a TNG approach, that while the powers that be would throw a bone to the original fans, they would be looking to hook an all new, and forgive me, younger television viewing demographic.

ST:TNG worked because it had such a HUGE storyline universe to expand upon, with not much from the original series impacting events and characters. Collinsport is a universe unto itself with not much room to manuever around past events. There would still be a lot of people around who remembered the events of 40 years prior.
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: MagnusTrask on October 31, 2006, 12:38:56 AM
So, there must be writers familiar enough with DS to make sure the new plots don't break continuity... if they want the job they'd better bone up fast.

As for network interference... we're talking about the way it should be.   Networks can always screw it up, and it's inevitable these days.   Someone would have to be there to fight that.

The immortals could be recast.
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Zahir on October 31, 2006, 01:23:52 AM
I feel compelled to point out there was precious little continuity in the original series.  Remember Jeremiah Collins, Elizabeth's grandfather?  Or Josette's death in 1797?  Or Collinwood being built in the 1820s?  And how about those cousins in the 1840s--where did they come from?
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: arashi on October 31, 2006, 02:23:43 AM
Yeah there was precious little continuity in the original series, but there are established character facts. Barnabas, Quentin and Angelique are all immortal. They'd somehow have to explain their eternal youth to the family. There'd be their backtories alone to explain to new viewers, not to mention the histories of both houses.

I'm not saying it's impossible, just highly unlikely that if there WAS to be a new series that it would not feature the introduction of Barnabas, the retelling of 1795, etc. etc.
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Brandon Collins on October 31, 2006, 02:59:41 AM
The TNG approach is tricky, I'll give you that. But this is how I've approached it in my TNG story that I'm working on:

David is master of Collinwood.
Barnabas has aged, and has a child. They both turn up at Collinwood after years of absense, disappearing in the 80s.
Quentin is still young (haven't figured out how to 'splain that yet).

I haven't worked Angelique in yet, and I don't know if I plan to just now.

But, the continuity from the original series can easily be worked around. For example, if you take major plot points from the original series like Barnabas being turned into a vamp in 1795, at age 25, etc, and only use a select few. You could always say that the deviations from the original story in the pre-Barn and early post-Barn eps were simply PT universes that the people got transported into unknowingly when they went back in time, and that everything pre-Barn was the PRESENT time DS universe.

THAT would provide a great story to look into--someone or other in the family could make a discovery about this that would change the way they think about their family forever.

 [female_skull]
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: MagnusTrask on October 31, 2006, 03:03:59 AM
Yet another retelling (I didn't know until recently that the 2004 pilot was like this) would be an admission of a severe lack of imagination, though the writers wouldn't realize it.   If a new series can't cultivate new characters (a 50 or 60 year old David would be a new character) then it won't be able to create new dialogue, situations, or plots either, and therefore will die.

Zahir... where's your name from by the way?    Anyway, there is a certain vague overall continuity that can be adhered to.   I'd want a new DS to avoid the screw-ups of the original.    They'd have to devote a bit of time and effort to coming as close as possible to reconciling them---  as much as anyone could.
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Zahir on October 31, 2006, 03:21:41 AM
Actually, as of the series finale, Quentin is the only immortal.  Angelique, when last we saw her, was a mortal woman again.  Barnabas was no longer a vampire.  Quentin could easily have gone off somewhere to not explain his aging.  He's done it before.  Maybe he's had plastic surgery, even!

The advantages I see in TNG approach is that it is a polite and respectful nod to the original fans without getting bogged down (at least not too much) in former continuity.  Frankly, a few flubs that way are to be expected.  TREK did it.  The original series did it all the time.  With a little care those can be kept to the minimum.  On the other hand, many of the iconic things about DS would of necessity go by the wayside.  No Barnabas/Josette/Angelique triangle.  No Julia Hoffman.

A true re-imagining gets around that, by pulling a BG (Battlestar: Galactica).  Or if you will, imagine the story as another thread of Parallel Time, another continuity altogether (like Marilyn Ross's novels).  Then you can not only tell an old story in a truly refreshing way, but put upon elements from all of canon--not only 1969 but 1895 and 1797 and 1840.  Among other things, this might mean more members to the Collins family.  Quentin might be Roger and Elizabeth's brother.  There might be a branch of "poor cousins" who live in Collinsport.  Etc. Etc.

"Zahir" btw is my dance name.  A former girlfriend of mine was into Middle Eastern Dance.  She got me into it, and I found it was a lot of fun.  Traditionally, dancers (usually but not always) take "Dance names" to perform.  Zahir is Turkish for "the blooming flower" (the feminine version is Zahira).  My given name is David.

In other words, I am a male belly dancer.  Yes, there are such things.  No, I do not dress up like Barbara Eden.   [hall_shocked]
Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: DSFan008 on October 31, 2006, 04:07:07 AM
i voted for a retelling of the original series...with a slight retooling.

the reason for this is simple,

1) introduces new fans/ppl to the DS story.

2) Retells the story for fans

3) Helps to establish continuity for a Next-Gen show.

the original was such a great show and had so many great stories that they should be retold, plus create some new ones that would fill in gaps from the original.

plus after a few seasons we could spin-off a NG show with some of the new show actors, i.e Barnabas and Quinten playing their imortal selves with new actors playing the older charoline and adult david.

Title: Re: A New Dark Shadows?
Post by: Zahir on October 31, 2006, 04:13:17 PM
One of the problems with "slight retooling" is that in many ways DS (in terms of plot) is just a fusion of different genres and previous horror stories.  Take all the Victoria Hold novels of the 1960s, toss in Dracula with a few dashes of the Boris Karloff film The Mummy, add The Wolf Man and a few good haunted house movies and there you have it.

More, the original was quite frankly dated.  Not so much by being set in the late 1960s but by being broadcast then.  The conventions of a daytime serial in 1969 are not condusive to a successful weekly program in the early 21st century.  We have grown used to a different kind of story-telling, in the wake of such shows as Alias and Thirtysomething and ER and Law & Order.  For a new Dark Shadows to attract a large new audience (which is the only way for it to survive) then it must take that into account.

We won't accept Victoria Winters as such a waif-like innocent who never once connects the dots.  We expect surprises, twists and turns in the plot as more details are revealed.  We have grown to expect edgier characters in dynamic relationships.

That is why my own preference would be for a true re-imagining.  In the version I put together (for my own fun, frankly) Victoria has a criminal record, Roger is in a wheelchair a la Gabriel Collins, David has been replaced by an autistic teenager named Daphne, and when they find the coffin in the secret room of the mausoleum its chains are long-since broken, with a decades-old corpse drained dry next to it.

But the advantage of a spinoff (a al Deep Space Nine) is that you'd be able to give something to the DS fans without trampling on any cherished images, characters, etc.  The writers and producers would have the freedom to create their own world, rather than trying to adapt a forty-year-old set of stories and characters to 2007.