Author Topic: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017  (Read 3692 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2015, 01:42:16 AM »
A bit more info (apparently the above article wasn't "everything" you need to know):

Twin Peaks’ promises ‘satisfying’ answers about Agent Cooper and the Black Lodge

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile

Offline KMR

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 707
  • Karma: +2/-1599
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2015, 07:41:50 PM »
Twin Peaks: Another MVP Returning for Upcoming Showtime Revival

Well, I would certainly hope so! A Twin Peaks revival without Badalamenti is totally unthinkable!

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2015, 09:07:31 PM »
David Lynch begs ‘Twin Peaks’ fans to stop leaking plot details on Twitter

It's quite surprising that TP fans have agreed to stop posting spoilers! Some people live to post them. Asking them to stop posting spoilers would be like asking them to stop eating. But it's a testament to TP fans that they've agreed to respect the hashtag #KeepTheMysteryAlive.

Offline michael c

  • DSF God
  • *****
  • Posts: 3434
  • Karma: +653/-1184
  • Gender: Male
  • mr.collins i'm fed up with this nonsense!
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2015, 09:13:30 PM »
storyline specifics are "spoilers"...

pictures of sets and locations and casting information are NOT.
sleep 'til noon and your punishment shall be the dregs of the coffeepot.

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2015, 09:18:59 PM »
I haven't followed the situation on Twitter myself, but the article indicates that "full-on spoilers" were being posted.

Offline michael c

  • DSF God
  • *****
  • Posts: 3434
  • Karma: +653/-1184
  • Gender: Male
  • mr.collins i'm fed up with this nonsense!
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2015, 09:37:44 PM »
I haven't seen any specifics...

but there was grousing when a picture of the DINER was leaked. that's just ridiculous.
sleep 'til noon and your punishment shall be the dregs of the coffeepot.

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2015, 10:18:56 PM »
I seem to recall that a guy posted footage he'd taken with his cell phone while visiting the foyer set for the Depp/DS film - and he did so on a private Web site where only people who'd been allowed onto the site by him were allowed to see it - yet he was forced to take it down. So apparently Lynch and Burton are cut from the same cloth when it comes to even seeing sets.  [ghost_wink]

But so far as supposed spoilers go, the article shows that even the Twitter account holder where the TP info was being tweeted used the word "spoilers" when he tweeted: "Word has just reached me that David Lynch is not pleased with spoilers coming from the set. To respect David and Mark, we will stop at once." So I suppose that and the article's use of "full-on spoilers" would seem to indicate that more than just a few photos of the sets and what have you was being tweeted.  [ghost_undecided]

Offline michael c

  • DSF God
  • *****
  • Posts: 3434
  • Karma: +653/-1184
  • Gender: Male
  • mr.collins i'm fed up with this nonsense!
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2015, 10:32:36 PM »
what has me stumped is the presence of Sheryl Lee in the cast...

as we all know Laura Palmer is deader than a doornail. so is her lookalike cousin.


and ghosts and visions do not age. Palmer died as a teenager and Lee is now in her 40s. is she playing a living flesh and blood character???
sleep 'til noon and your punishment shall be the dregs of the coffeepot.

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2015, 11:16:31 PM »

Offline Uncle Roger

  • * 200000, 250000 & 300000 Poster!! *
  • DIVINE SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • ***************
  • Posts: 32723
  • Karma: +7/-130970
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #13 on: September 21, 2015, 12:59:37 AM »
If the series had continued, there were tentative plans to bring Sheryl Lee back as another character, though with red hair. Maybe that's the direction they're taking.
Fade Away and Radiate

Offline The Doctor and K9

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 845
  • Karma: +1584/-6277
  • Gender: Male
  • I Love DS!
    • View Profile
Re: Twin Peaks Revival Pushed to 2017
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2015, 01:45:03 AM »
If the series had continued, there were tentative plans to bring Sheryl Lee back as another character, though with red hair. Maybe that's the direction they're taking.
That's CRAZY!! They can't do that!!! THE AUDIENCE WILL GET CONFUSED!!! That would be her THIRD character. No TV show ever does that!