Author Topic: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants  (Read 3415 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Taeylor Collins

  • The Guardian of Grayson's Shadows
  • DSF God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Karma: +180/-242
  • Gender: Male
  • "Is he for real?" Julia Hoffman
    • View Profile
    • Facebook Page!
Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« on: February 23, 2007, 04:49:06 AM »
I finally got to watch 1795 for the first time.  I completed it in two weeks and it was very good.  Me and my grandmother watched together.  She had watched the show in the sixties and remembered little.  However, she said what I was thinking.  She was like, "that mans pants are very vulgar" and I was setting there thinking the same thing.  LOL  This isn't to bash the actor or anything...but I don't know what the wardrobe department was thinking.  They were not flattering at all. I was distracted for the duration of the flashback anytime  he would come on the scene.  Did anyone find this anoying or werid?  It seems like in such conservative times this wouldn't have been allowed.  I hope this was okay to post about.
If you like DS and want to have a fun  on a Facebook page that is open to all forms of DS and doesn't allow childish behavior like some groups; come on over to DIAESD! You do have to ask to be invited and I will approve you.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/106113906083853/

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2007, 04:59:05 AM »
If you check through past posts, you'll notice that Nathan's pants has generated quite a few topics, including this one:

Hmmm...

Also, the good Lieutenant's pants have even been featured as one of the forum's floaties:

However, if your grandmother thinks Nathan's pants "are very vulgar," just wait until she gets to the 1841PT storyline! The men's costumes in that storyline make Nathan's uniform look like he was wearing a loose sack.  [lghy]

David

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2007, 05:06:18 AM »
I thought Nathan's pants were HOT!!!
;D

David

Offline Taeylor Collins

  • The Guardian of Grayson's Shadows
  • DSF God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Karma: +180/-242
  • Gender: Male
  • "Is he for real?" Julia Hoffman
    • View Profile
    • Facebook Page!
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2007, 06:34:19 AM »
I meant to specify that I wasn't thinking they were vulgar...but I was thinking about how noticeable his stuff was! I aint as old fashioned as she is. >:D
If you like DS and want to have a fun  on a Facebook page that is open to all forms of DS and doesn't allow childish behavior like some groups; come on over to DIAESD! You do have to ask to be invited and I will approve you.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/106113906083853/

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2007, 07:11:28 AM »
I was thinking about how noticeable his stuff was! I aint as old fashioned as she is. >:D

Then you have something to really look forward to once you get to 1841PT.  :D

Online MagnusTrask

  • * 100000 Poster!! *
  • DIVINE SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • ***************
  • Posts: 29347
  • Karma: +4533/-74785
  • Gender: Male
  • u r summoned by the powers of everlasting light!
    • View Profile
    • The Embryo Room
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2007, 08:08:54 AM »
Then you have something to really look forward to once you get to 1841PT.  :D

Grossly protuberant wang in a semi-accurate historical context?
"One can never go wrong with weapons and drinks as fashion accessories."-- the eminent and clearly quotable Dark Shadows fan and board mod known as Mysterious Benefactor

Offline Nelson Collins

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 796
  • Karma: +1383/-1366
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2007, 01:38:34 PM »
Grossly protuberant wang in a semi-accurate historical context?
Or to put it another way ...

Recalcitrant franks ....  :P :o ;D

(see the Elizabeth the Beautiful thread for details)
There's not a man on my ottoman, there hasn't been one in weeks.
There's not a man on my ottoman, he's gone off to fight the Greeks.

Offline tripwire

  • Full A ed Newest Fervor Post
  • Full Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • Karma: +15/-114
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2007, 03:18:01 PM »
I am sure that Mrs. Johnson and ole Willie and perhaps Peter Bradford, along with Gomers cousin Goober and Richard Long from that 60s Western would all have something to say about them pants.
its a sudden death that i know, my father wrote me to say that, my cousin, uncle jeremiah was, was very disturbed.

Offline Gothick

  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 6608
  • Karma: +124/-2895
  • Gender: Male
  • Somebody book me a suite at Wyndcliffe, NOW!
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2007, 04:39:01 PM »
I, personally, thought that the original "Bad Lieutenant's" trousers were a most refined showcase for his glorious body, including his truly luscious Manhood.  *sigh*

I have to admit I am tee-heeing over the thought of the nice old lady scowling and muttering "That man's pants are VULGAR."

G.

Offline Nelson Collins

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 796
  • Karma: +1383/-1366
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2007, 06:15:58 PM »
Well, to be pedantic, it's not the pants that are distracting.....  >:D Tee hee!
There's not a man on my ottoman, there hasn't been one in weeks.
There's not a man on my ottoman, he's gone off to fight the Greeks.

Offline Alondra

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 649
  • Karma: +63304/-20402
  • Gender: Female
  • Dark Shadows Forever!
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2007, 07:28:46 PM »
However, if your grandmother thinks Nathan's pants "are very vulgar," just wait until she gets to the 1841PT storyline! The men's costumes in that storyline make Nathan's uniform look like he was wearing a loose sack.

And the 1840 storyline in which John Karlen as Desmond is wearing similar tight pants, sighhhhhhhh......

Alondra
:P

David

  • Guest
A Personal Message From Abigail Collins
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2007, 07:41:23 PM »
Ms Collins' ghost appeared before my bible study group last night with the followng message:

"The clothes you are wearing are SHOCKINGLY immodest, to say the least!!!!"

David

Offline Nelson Collins

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 796
  • Karma: +1383/-1366
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #12 on: February 24, 2007, 01:50:33 AM »
Any particular episodes where the pants are especially vulgar?  (I want to know which eps to avoid in future, you know. ahem.) >:D
There's not a man on my ottoman, there hasn't been one in weeks.
There's not a man on my ottoman, he's gone off to fight the Greeks.

Offline MsCriseyde

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 1681
  • Karma: +9655/-16931
  • Gender: Female
  • Even the name reeks of Ohrbach's!
    • View Profile
    • Criseyde's David Selby Site
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #13 on: February 24, 2007, 03:03:46 AM »
However, if your grandmother thinks Nathan's pants "are very vulgar," just wait until she gets to the 1841PT storyline! The men's costumes in that storyline make Nathan's uniform look like he was wearing a loose sack.
He was . . . under the pants.  [a2a3]


Dark Shadows Alumni Movies (Includes a DS News page.)

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 16240
  • Karma: +205/-12199
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Nathan Forbes "distracting" pants
« Reply #14 on: February 24, 2007, 03:08:04 AM »
You know, when I wrote that I just knew that someone was going to go there - particularly in this crowd.  ;)  But I left it anyway.

However, "loose sacks" are the things least on view in 1841PT.  :D