Josette's the woman he holds every other woman to for most of the show. Maggie, Rachel, Kitty and Victoria all remind him in either looks (Maggie, Rachel, Kitty) or personality (Victoria) of Josette. Kitty's a different case because she actually was the re-incarnation of Josette. It's just a shame they went about it like a possession instead of the way it was supposed to be. It's obviously all about Josette with these women and Josette only, with one exception - Victoria. A very good argument can be made that he loved Victoria by the time she left the show, and not because of her similarity to Josette. He let her go because she was happy with Peter.
That leads us to Roxanne, which I don't get. With the others, it was Josette. His relationship with Victoria was built up over time to become much more than just Josette and IMO, it works well. It's believable. With Roxanne, however, it's just magically supposed to be there. It's
very similar to Quentin & Amanda Harris. I was half expecting him to recite "I'll Be With You Always" to her while they danced.
There's no build up or development, it's just suddenly there. And that doesn't work. It didn't work with Quentin and it didn't work with him.
Only one left - Angelique. I felt his declaration in 1840 was way,
way out of character. I couldn't believe a word of it. For me it was just a way for the writers to tie up the storyline to change everything to PT and the characters suffered for it. Him telling her that he'd forgiven her - perhaps in the hope it might give her peace - would have been much more believable and a lot more powerful. Best of all, it wouldn't have belittled so many people he loved (Josette, his family in 1795, Victoria...etc - honestly, that's what bothers me most of all).
*Ducks flying brandy glasses*,
In the last year of the show, it seemed to me that character development had kind of fallen by the way side, and the plots dictated everything. I think Roxanne, and most definitely Angelique, were out of character for Barnabas.