And here's the fourteenth page -
(Click
here for a 1328X1996 version)
Note that the fourth panel and its dialogue were skipped in the slideshow...
And speaking of the subject of the painting, would anyone who didn't read the comments in SG #66 know that it's supposedly Angelique in contemporary modern clothes?! The dialogue on the page makes it pretty clear that Roger is speaking to the painting as if it is Laura, not Angelique, so why would anyone jump to the conclusion that it is Angelique?! And what is it about what the woman in the portrait is wearing that screams contemporary modern clothes and only contemporary modern? And to complicate things further, in Book 1, Issue 2 we did see that Roger has painted both portraits of Laura (naked) and portraits of Angelique (dressed in 18th century clothes).
Although, if we're simply following what's been presented in the comics, in Book 1, Issue 3 we've seen that Roger has seemingly been tormented by Angelique. But that only makes things more confusing because there's been absolutely no explanation for it. Though perhaps they deliberately planned to keep people in the dark until an explanation might have come in Book 4, which was to focus on Laura and Angelique. And, of course, when it comes to Laura and Angelique we have no idea what was planned for Book 3, Issues 2 through 4 as SG #62 claimed Book 3 would have "significantly more background" on Roger's marriage to Laura. But alas...