Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Brian

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 »
226
its not all coberts music but there is plenty of it. one mistake i noticed, they were playing blue whale music in maggies coffee shop? i guess maggie jazzed up the place and installed a juke box and loaded it with the same popular tunes that the blue whale had!

Sorry if someone else addressed this...just started reading the thread as I just received the first two CDs.  RE Coberts music in the Inn, I noted it was a Blue Whale theme, but also thought the title of the piece used was a very appropriate comment on the characters' relationships and history.  Will be finishing CD 1 tomorrow, then on to # 2.  So far, it's very enjoyable.  Also, what a great idea!  Audio dramas like old-time radio soaps on CD--perfect for commutes to and from work, etc.  I may have to write and produce some of my own (not-DS) stuff.   [hall2_grin]

Brian

227
Current Talk '06 II / Re: Who was upset that DS ended in 1840 PT?
« on: October 16, 2006, 02:22:16 AM »
I remember seeing a clipping from a magazine published in Jan. of 1971 introducing Keith Prentice to teen readers and commenting that he had signed a "five year contract" for DS.  Difficult though it seems to believe now, the DS TPTB may have been hoping to have Prentice be the hot new male property on the show.

I knew Keith in the early 1980s, after he had returned to Dayton, Ohio, to care for his ill mother.  Shortly after we met, Keith and I went on a dinner date, which ended at my apartment.  Keith was the perfect gentleman with me, and did not try to take advantage of me--even though I was, at the time, young enough to be his son (I was well past 18, BTW--LOL).  Although he had very strong opinons about his DS cast members--some very nice and some not so nice--he never mentioned anything about the show signing him to a five year contract.  Instead, Keith talked about his short-lived DS appearances as just another job, while he looked for other work in NY.  He also told me that he was not that pleased with the film CRUISING, in which he made a short appearance, and was mostly upset that the murder of his character was "left on the cutting room floor," as they say.  He also made some strong comments about Richard Rodgers's attraction to young chorus girls (Keith was in the 1959 Broadway production of THE SOUND OF MUSIC), a claim that has been confirmed in recent Rodgers bios.  Keith has his fans and detractors, but he was very nice to me and my theater friends in Dayton, and I am very pleased to have known him.   

228
Current Talk '06 II / Re: DS DVD Volume 26 Listed as Best Seller
« on: October 03, 2006, 02:21:28 AM »
This will be brief:  my reason for joining MPI is "what Midnight said!" PLUS, I want that "members only" complete boxed CD set of ALL the Cobert DS music cues.  And the free Barnabas and Angelique bobbleheads-not something I would actually choose to buy-look nice on my knick-knack shelf.  The coffin is in storage, waiting for more bobbleheads....and then I'll probably offer them all on eBay and pay for my retirement.   ;)

229
Current Talk '06 II / DS on widescreen HDTV
« on: October 01, 2006, 03:01:30 AM »
I've been watching the DS DVDs (now on 22), and sometimes I use the "zoom" feature on my 42" widescreen plasma TV, and--surprisingly--the show doesn't suffer too much from being enlarged to fill the screen.  Granted, it's not the original way the videographers intended it to be seen, but the original series' video wasn't exactly the most artistic in its capture of the picture.  It's actually enjoyable to watch this way....

230
Current Talk '06 II / Re: DS Marilyn Ross Books
« on: September 29, 2006, 02:17:36 AM »
Not that I can find the few missing books, but I once had the complete series, bought during the original releases at the 50-75 cents prices;  after keeping them for more than 25 years, I finally sold them to a NEW DS fan, for a relatively low auction-type price, through this DS site.  I know that fan was very appreciative and enjoyed the books.  Maybe someday, she will offer some of the rarer books for sale.  

231
Current Talk '06 II / Re: The Salem Branch - Your thoughts
« on: September 16, 2006, 05:42:56 AM »
Here Lies Midnite
She Got Letters

LOL!  Got my chuckle for the day!  ;)

Buzz, you beat me to it...I, too, LOL--okay--ROFLMAO--about Midnight's epitaph!

And Midnight: I'm still laughing.  Thanks for making my night!!

232
Current Talk '06 II / Re: The Salem Branch - Your thoughts
« on: September 16, 2006, 05:38:53 AM »
Here Lies Midnite
She Got Letters

LOL!  Got my chuckle for the day!  ;)

Buzz, you beat me to it...I, too, LOL--okay--ROFLMAO--about Midnight's epitaph!

233
Current Talk '06 II / Re: The Salem Branch - Your thoughts
« on: September 14, 2006, 03:40:19 AM »
I finished the book this afternoon.  First, sorry, Midnight, for bringing politics onto the board--but I must say that the Salem Witch Trials were all about -- in my humble opinion -- politics, and misguided religous fanatics, as DS showed us with Trask, and as LP makes clear in her book.

As for the "last act surprise"...without offering spoilers, the final chapter's revelations, which have been dissed in some board comments, are totally in line with the exposition that we read earlier in the novel, specifically with regards to a certain female character...this is set up very early on, and should not be a surprise to astute readers of the book.

Just my observations and opinions....

Brian

234
Current Talk '06 II / Re: The Salem Branch - 1692 Witch Triala
« on: September 13, 2006, 03:18:42 AM »
I'm near the end--20 pages--but I must share with everyone:  for a dramatization of the Salem trials as described in the book, please check out THREE SOVEREIGNS FOR SARAH, a PBS film from 1985 (available on DVD) starring Vanessa Redgrave, Kim Hunter and Phyllis Thaxter.  This very moving and historically accurate film also reminds us of the McCarthy hearings of the early 50s (as does THE CRUCIBLE), and, to a lessor degree--since this pre-dates the current administration--the arrogance of the Bush/Cheney/Rove White House.  (Perhaps that last connection is what prompted LP to write the book in the first place.)  Regardlaess of your politics, please try to see THREE SOVEREIGNS FOR SARAH.

235
Current Talk '06 II / Re: The Salem Branch - Your thoughts
« on: September 12, 2006, 03:35:27 AM »
I have enjoyed this book, for the most part, and now I have one chapter left (more on that later, I'm sure), but I feel I should share my thoughts on the "descriptive nature" of the writing in the early parts of the book, such as overuse of adjectives and adverbs..."can you say Edward George Bulwer-Lytton?"

For my own personal taste, less is more, and Stephen King knows how to use his adjectives and adverbs to create images that my brain can visualize.

Still, thanks to Lara Parker for carrying the DS story forward.  There were times when reading the novel that I was totally captivated by the story, characters and imagery.

Now, on to that last chapter. . .

Brian

236
Current Talk '06 II / "1995" episode 1062 Jean Flagler
« on: August 20, 2006, 04:50:38 AM »
I'm just getting around to watching the 1995 episodes on DVD, and # 1062, the one in which Julia and Barnabas interview Flagler, includes Julia holding up a framed picture of Mrs. Flagler, who looks very much like a young Shirley Grayson (aka Grayson Hall).  Does anyone know if the photo used was of Ms. Grayson?

Brian

237
Current Talk '06 II / Re: Grayson Hall--Better than Heroin!
« on: August 05, 2006, 05:40:57 AM »
In addition to all the works quoted in this thread (most of which I have on tape or DVD), I've had the pleasure (??) of finding copies of Grayson's work in a couple of other rare films:  "Qui ƒªtes-vous, Polly Maggoo?"  and "The Parisienne and the Prudes."  Not much for her to do  in "Prudes," (only one short scene), but she's quite fun in "Polly Maggoo" even though it's all in French.

Brian

238
Polls Archive / Re: DS Religions
« on: July 29, 2006, 04:10:30 AM »
Atheist, here, not agnostic.  And my beliefs have been formed, in part, due to my youthful exposure to DS, among many other factors.  I cannot really believe there is a   loving god, or believe in any organized religion, after being exposed to the likes of Reverend Trask (and many years later, the DS91 version!), Tammy Faye's former husband (forget his first name), Jerry Falwell, Pat Buchananan, and Al Quaida, etc. ?  I don't mean to offend anyone or belittle your beliefs, but these are mine and my reasonings for my beliefs.  Again, I can mostly thank DS for making me think about such things. 

Brian

239
Current Talk '06 II / DS revival series observation
« on: July 24, 2006, 01:28:12 AM »
Some time ago, I posted a comment about the DS revival series DVD collection, which was released in a matted 16x9 version.  Well, the DVD release looks great on a widescreen TV--even the original series (which was not exactly recorded with the screen composition as a top priority) looks good when zoomed to fit a 16x9 screen.

But that's not the intent of this message.  I think I may have posted this a long time ago--if so, please forgive me.  If not, then I'd like to hear from others about this:  in episode 1 of the revival series, at about 15 minutes and 30 seconds into the show, as Carolyn leads Vicki upstairs, we see a portrait of Ben Cross as Barnabas on the right side of the frame.  On the left is a portrait of another Collins ancestor, strongly resembling Thayer David.  Did anyone else notice this, and does anyone know if Mr. David is the subject in that portrait, perhaps as a tribute by DC?

Thanks,

Brian

240
Current Talk '06 II / Re: Leviathan story vs 1970PT story
« on: July 12, 2006, 01:37:04 AM »
But alas, Curtis was ruled by audience response and all too often tweaked the plots accordingly.

Of course, I can't speak for others soaps of yesteryear, but it's common knowledge that DS was usually (though not always) taped one week before the air date, and it would have been much easier to adjust the story in response to fan reactions than it is nowadays, when soaps (at least ONE LIFE TO LIFE, the only one I watch) are taped as much as 6 weeks before airing.

Also, please don't get me wrong: I don't hate 1970PT--I do like the "bad guys," (Angelique, Hoffman, esp. Timothy Stokes)--but the Jekyll/Hyde was too obvious to me, even in 1970.  I didn't know anything about REBECCA back then though (the NODS line about Mrs. Danvers meant nothing to me when I first saw that movie), but now that I've read the book and seen the classic film, the DS version seems more obviously a rip-off than a homage (yes, I know DC admits to "ripping off" the classics, but that's anothetr thread.)

Of course, I could take this in a whole different direction by comparing either of these story lines to 1897--which is my all-time favorite--or the 1840 period, which is second to 1897, to me, anyway.  But those are discussion for even yet another thread. [b054]

Brian

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 »