Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Philippe Cordier

1096
Calendar Events / Announcements '03 I / Re:Suspiria Alert
« on: April 02, 2003, 01:15:30 AM »

And didn't it seem like that girl's friend was overreacting?  How did she know that her friend was being murdered?

Sarah? She drove me absolutely nuts. I think it was an IMDB review where I read one person's perplexed comments about her. She hears the footsteps every night and instead of at least considering a logical conclusion like maybe the teachers were having a meeting or coffee or something, she becomes obsessed by the notion that it's suspicious. Another Rachel Drummond, lol.

Actually, I meant the Italian-looking girl at the beginning who lived in that big, empty pink geometric building. She was screaming her head off as if she knew what was happening in the other room when the first girl was being murdered.

I was actually quite confused at this point as it was, since it wasn't clear to me that this was the same girl seen briefly running out of the ballet school talking incoherently about the secret blue irises.  The next shot was of the Jessica Harper character (how flat a performance can you possibly give?  ???) in the taxi gazing benignly as this girl cavorts hysterically through the forest in the rain, and the next shot, in which it is not raining, is from the back and shows a girl, who I assumed to be the Jessica Harper character, approaching the pink geometric apartment building ...


1097
Calendar Events / Announcements '03 I / Re:Suspiria Alert
« on: April 02, 2003, 01:01:04 AM »
Thanks for all the additional information.  I checked the "Valli" photo and will be sure to get to the other links you mentioned ... (although, Luciaphil, I have to admit I never got around to checking those links you provided a while back on East Lake furnishings ... :( hopefully one of these days ...  :-[
(have been rather busy with recent projects-- plus recently have been forced to find a job and work full-time when I realized the rent is due ..  :o)

I am still rather intrigued by the movie after reading all the comments here and after my viewing of it.  My feelings were rather mixed, but I would certainly watch it again, whereas I have never, ever had any interest in the modern "slasher" flicks ... saw part of one at someone's apartment once, and it was incredibly stupid with in-your-face gore galore.

I felt "Suspiria" was more intelligent and thought-provoking.  Certainly the visual composition and sets were interesting and very well planned.  But then, these things are painstakingly planned for all movies, down to every possible detail, no matter how worthless the movie turns out to be (I learned this first hand spending time on location as an extra and stand-in on three different movies -- quite interesting to see how they are made and the care and detail that goes into every angle, color, etc.  For example I played a customer in a bank, and the real bank was completely redone with green carpet, etc., to subliminaly convey the idea of money).

Anyway, I keep going off-topic here so should wrap things up.  It seems that "cult" movies like this tend to be over-hyped and often leave a lot of people cold; but there truly has to be some aspect about them that makes them stand out from the crowd.

The movie is much more recent than, say, "Rosemary's Baby," so I wonder why the print quality was so poor.  I'd be curious to know if the DVD or video has a higher quality print.

OT -- BTW, did anyone else see the superbly done Victorian drama "Daniel Deronda" Sun & Monday nights?  :)


1098
Calendar Events / Announcements '03 I / Re:Suspiria Alert
« on: April 01, 2003, 01:46:50 AM »
I watched my tape of the SciFi airing on Saturday night.  The movie wasn't too bad and definitely had some points of interest.  I'm not sure, though, whether I would have stuck with it had I just happened to turn it on without having heard about it here.  ;D

It's hard for me to know for sure if DS is influencing me or not, but I did think that Joan Bennett's performance was the best part of the film.  I had slightly mixed feelings about the square-built German woman; would be interesting to know if she is an actress of note (excuse my lack of knowledge)?  Bennett did keep you guessing as to her true nature, as the movie also kept the viewer guessing right up to the end.  That aspect was quite well done -- not knowing who was evil and who wasn't.

Parts of it seemed to "borrow" rather freely from "Rosemary's Baby" -- e.g., the "healthful" food that the main character was given to build up her strength, and the climactic discovery in the adjacent chambers of who the witches really were.  The movie itself, though, was no "Rosemary's Baby."  It seemed more like a cheap drive-in type of movie (not that I've ever actually been to a drive-in) ... and it did seem rather surprising that someone of Miss Bennett's stature would have wanted to be in it.  Just what is the director's reputation?

There were so many movies like this, a lot of them made-for-TV movies (e.g., Satan's School for Girls) in the 1970s ...

The music really did keep you on edge -- like fingernails on a chalkboard ...

What language was the movie originally made in?  The mouths and words didn't seem to match ... Was Joan Bennett speaking Italian?

And I definitely didn't hear her say "bitch" -- all she said was something about getting rid of "that American girl."  :(

What was the deal with the coils of wire that girl fell into?  And the first one who was murdered, it looked like the hairy arm was plugging an electrical cord into her.  And how did that black lingerie stay on the clothesline outside the apartment window with all the wind?!?  And didn't it seem like that girl's friend was overreacting?  How did she know that her friend was being murdered?  What was with the actor playing the psychiatrist -- it looked like he was reading his lines from a teleprompter.

Did SciFi alter the film much?  I assume they dubbed over the naughty word Joan Bennett was supposed to have said.

What are the differences in the two DVD versions?


1099
Current Talk '03 I / Haunting Memories
« on: March 30, 2003, 12:14:11 AM »
The scene where Lady Hampshire is drawn to Josette's bedroom was vintage DS ... a memorable moment in DS which I had forgotten.  Very effectively done in terms of lighting, sets, costume, direction, and KLS's performance.  I was enthralled when Lady H. poured the two glasses of sherry ...

And thematically, at least as Dan Curtis has stated in interviews, it would seem that this scene embodies the very essence of Dark Shadows ... (the vampire and his reincarnated lost love).



1100
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Josette's Painting - 1797?
« on: March 30, 2003, 12:08:46 AM »
Here I had it all figured out that this portrait of Josette was simply a copy the Collins family commissioned from the original (perhaps having returned the original to Josette's father or surving relative).

But if 1795 is hereafter referred to as 1797, I guess that shoots my theory ...

However, I did think that this portrait looked more like KLS than what we had seen before ... which would support the theory that DS produced a new portrait for this storyline.

1101
What can I say, the episode was, for me, a big disappointment after seeing Ms. Parker as Angelique on "Dark Shadows."

I managed to figure out when/where this was showing and taped it while at work ... I've only been able to see the first 30 minutes so far, but I have to admit that this wasn't one of Lara Parker's better credits.

So far I've seen her in DS, in "Save the Tiger," and in live performance in "Love Letters."  The Kolchak episode is definitely the least impressive of these.

It did require more camp than DS, IMO.



1102
Oh, I wish you had said what station/network/channel it's going to be on!

All the shows mentioned will be on SciFi, Vlad

Thanks -- although I'm seeing your message after the fact, it occurred to me after I posted to do a quick search on TV Guide online before I left the computer lab -- and was able to get the info.


1103
Another one it looks like I'm going to miss ... have never heard of the Mystery Channel ... know I don't get it.

 :'( :'( :'(


1104
Bumping this up since it's coming up soon. Also, tomorrow (03/28) the Kolchak: The Night Stalker episode with Lara Parker will be airing at 12:00PM (EST).

Oh, I wish you had said what station/network/channel it's going to be on!  Our local TV guides don't list all the channels (e.g., Hallmark and Soapnet are two I can think of that aren't even listed).

Unfortunately, I won't have computer access again till Saturday or next week if you post a reply.

 :'(


1105
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Count Petofi and The Future
« on: March 27, 2003, 01:09:45 AM »
Rolling eyes not meant to be sarcastic ... the little guy does have a ho-hum sort of smile, doesn't he?   :)

However, since I brought it up, there seem to have been a number of scenes in the past couple of weeks that would tend to discount the theory ... Petofi's encounters with lovely women show his more than Platonic interest in them; Petofi in Quentin's body barely able to restrain himself with Angelique, who one suspects would ordinarily be out of his amorous reach ...

I still think Aristede is, though.   ;D



1106
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Count Petofi and The Future
« on: March 26, 2003, 04:30:35 AM »
Maybe the sight of Maggie in her miniskirt was enough to do it  ;D

You don't buy into the "Petofi is gay" theory, then?   ::)


1107
Calendar Events / Announcements '03 I / Re:Suspiria Alert
« on: March 26, 2003, 12:45:24 AM »
Just to clarify for anyone else who finds these late night/early morning airings confusing ... This will air "late night Thursday" -- technically in the wee hours of Friday morning.  I'm glad I happened to notice that in my TV schedule, because I was thinking it was going to be late night Friday.


1108
Calendar Events / Announcements '03 I / Re:ShadowGram Update #91
« on: March 23, 2003, 12:48:38 AM »
I wasn't aware of it until recently (I'm waaaay out of the loop on things like this), but apparently there's a bobblehead of just about any and everything that has ever been on television

I didn't know that -- I was barely aware of what these things are as it was.

Quote
or, for that matter, a replica of a music box that looks like a plastic cup and now sells for over $100

Make that $150.

Wish you hadn't described it as a "plastic cup," Castlebee dear ... now that's probably the cold reality of what I'll see whenever I look at mine ...

 >:(


1109
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Petofi's Nose
« on: March 23, 2003, 12:42:23 AM »
Well, I happened to be home this morning and turned on the set, and the show was on, and the camera showed the top of Petofi's face and was right over his nose--and I'm sorry, but if there was any tape or putty there, *I* didn't see it.

Belated response:  I didn't see anything that day either.

What are the explanations?  Am I imagining things, like Edward thinks Kitty is?  I feel a bit like Quentin trying to persuade everyone who he really is ... and everyone thinks he's mad.  Maybe I am actually crazy!  Or, maybe the nose doesn't turn out the same every day, and sometimes it's more noticeable than at other times.

Sorry for driving this subject into the ground, but I did want to respond because I agreed with your observation on that particular day, and since then haven't been sure if I'm detecting it.

 :-X

-Vlad -- "mad, bad, and dangerous to know"  >:(




1110
Calendar Events / Announcements '03 I / Re:Suspiria Alert
« on: March 23, 2003, 12:35:13 AM »
Never heard of it, but will try to catch it.  Thanks for telling us!  :)