If you ask me, Desmond did a much better job [spoiler]defending Quentin during his witchcraft trial in 1840 than Peter did Vicki at her witchcraft trial in 1795. Desmond successfully was able to get Samantha's clearly spiteful and prejudicial testimony against Quentin thrown out, while Peter couldn't even put a dent in the damaging, perjuring testimony of Nathan Forbes. Had Desmond not been wrongly implicated in practicing witchcraft himself, I think he could have gotten Quentin acquitted.[/spoiler]
Does this convey my answer clearly enough? [hall2_wink]
Based on his lawyering skills, or should we say lack thereof, back in August of 2003 we rechristened him Bozo Bradford. [hall2_grin]
Not only is Desmond a better lawyer, Karlen's a better actor!!!!!
Does this convey my answer clearly enough? [hall2_wink]
based on his lawyering skills, or should we say lack thereof, back in August of 2003 we rechristened him Bozo Bradford. [hall2_grin]