Nathan Forbes is an admirable liar. Most of the time on Dark Shadows, when somebody lies, he or she makes it obvious. But during his conversation with Peter Bradford, Nathan stuck to his colors as if they were the true ones.
The scuffle between Nathan and Peter wasn't very well-executed. Nathan seemed to be winning, even when he was on the floor. I think we were supposed to leave the scene with the impression that Peter was a better man than Nathan because he beat Nathan in a fight, which somehow relates to Joshua's belief that Nathan couldn't have killed Suki because he didn't have the guts. It just doesn't come across that way to me. Joel Crothers's Nathan seems to me to be capable of doing whatever he has to do to save his skin and get ahead in the world.
When Nathan was thinking to himself in the beginning, he said that now was the time to be thinking of himself. I wondered: is it ever the time to be thinking solely of oneself? Of course, when Vicky thought of others and told them to beware lest they come to the deaths foretold for them in the Collins Family History, she seemed like an absolute idiot. But I still think there had to be a way for her to try to help people without practically begging to be executed as a witch. Even if there wasn't, I would rather be a fool than a knave, so I would rather be Vicky than Nathan.