I forgot to mention that the cover image has been changed. Since I've never seen the pic from the Digest anywhere else, I wonder if the original copy of the photo has been lost. It doesn't seem to be the likely reason though. It can't be too hard to track down a mint copy of the book and use that as the template for the reprint. With photoshop and other software, I can't imagine it would be too hard to make that shot workable for the cover. They're using another, more familiar publicity still in its place.